Army Prosecutors Use Recorded Jailhouse Phone Conversations Against Hasan

Hopefully, the Defense will move to suppress or motion in limine to limit the use of these prejudicial recordings.   During recent litigation about Major Hasan’s insistence on maintaining his beard during court-martial proceedings, Army prosecutors argued the beard was intended to prevent witnesses from identifying Major Hasan at his trial and to align himself with Islamic extremists.

They submitted as evidence the transcript of a phone call between Major Hasan and a representative of Al Jazeera, the Qatar-based satellite broadcasting network. The phone call occurred in July 2011 while Major Hasan was in the Bell County Jail in nearby Belton, Tex. A prosecutor said that during the call, which had been recorded, Major Hasan pledged allegiance to the mujahedeen.

California Taxpayers Will Have To Weigh The High Cost Of Death Penalty Cases

Article Title

http://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/llr/vol46/iss0/1/

Costs of Capital Punishment in California: Will Voters Choose Reform this November?

Authors

Judge Arthur L. Alarcón
Paula M. Mitchell

Abstract

In a 2011 study, the authors examined the history of California’s death- penalty system to inform voters of the reasons for its extraordinary delays. There, they set forth suggestions that could be adopted by the legislature or through the initiative process that would reduce delays in executing death-penalty judgments. The study revealed that, since 1978, California’s current system has cost the state’s taxpayers $4 billion more than a system that has life in prison without the possibility of parole (“LWOP”) as its most severe penalty. In this article, the authors update voters on the findings presented in their 2011 study. Recent studies reveal that if the current system is maintained, Californians will spend an additional $5 billion to $7 billion over the cost of LWOP to fund the broken system between now and 2050. In that time, roughly 740 more inmates will be added to death row, an additional fourteen executions will be carried out, and more than five hundred death-row inmates will die of old age or other causes before the state executes them. Proposition 34, on the November 2012 ballot, will give voters the opportunity to determine whether they wish to retain the present broken death-penalty system—despite its cost and ineffectiveness—or whether the appropriate punishment for murder with special circumstances should be life in prison without the possibility of parole.

Recommended Citation

Judge Arthur L. Alarcón and Paula M. Mitchell, Costs of Capital Punishment in California: Will Voters Choose Reform this November?, 46 Loy. L.A. L.Rev. 1